[OpenBIOS] r640 - trunk/openbios-devel/arch/sparc64

[Andreas Färber]

Am 05.12.2009 um 14:57 schrieb Blue Swirl:

> On Sat, Dec 5, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Andreas Färber  
> <andreas.faerber at web.de> wrote:
>> Just updated to this revision from r636 and did a `make`:
>>
>> Building OpenBIOS for ppc sparc32 sparc64
>> Building...error:
>>  GEN   openbios.dict
>>  undefined word.
>> make[1]: *** [openbios.dict] Error 1
>> error:
>>  GEN   openbios.dict
>>  undefined word.
>> make[1]: *** [openbios.dict] Error 1
>> error:
>>  GEN   openbios.dict
>>  undefined word.
>> make[1]: *** [openbios.dict] Error 1
>> make: *** [build] Error 1
>>
>> After `make clean` it worked fine.
>>
>> Could there be something wrong with the dependency modelling?
>>
>> In obj-sparc32/rules.mak I found this line:
>> bootstrap-DICTIONARY:=$(bootstrap-DICTIONARY)
>> $(SRCDIR)/forth/bootstrap/start.fs
>> But I believe bootstrap.dict should also depend on
>> $(SRCDIR)/forth/bootstrap/bootstrap.fs, which was modified in r638.  
>> After a
>> switch-arch, it is then rebuilt before openbios.dict. See attached  
>> patch.
>>
>> However, there are some more .fs files in the forth/bootstrap  
>> folder that
>> are not referenced in build.xml. Should all such files be added to  
>> the
>> build.xml file in their folder, or are they / should they be  
>> referenced from
>> somewhere else?
>
> We can't use the conventional gcc .d file generation for Forth files,
> so they should be listed somewhere.

Extending my patch to add all .fs files in that folder to that  
build.xml section leads to an unusable OpenBIOS... still have to  
investigate which one(s) trigger this.

Andreas

> Or better yet, we could enhance the forthstrap tool to generate
> similar dependency files, that shouldn't be too hard.
>
> -- 
> OpenBIOS                 http://openbios.org/
> Mailinglist:  http://lists.openbios.org/mailman/listinfo
> Free your System - May the Forth be with you